Subdisciplinary Distribution

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 111 views

Introduction

Mapping science is an essential tool in understanding the development and structure of science in a field. It provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge, trends, and patterns in a particular area of study. In this study, the focus was carried out on online journals Read: Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI from 2014 to 2016. The main purpose of this study was to produce a clear map of science from 33 articles published in that period. The descriptive method used aims to uncover various important information about the characteristics of the published article.

Methodology

The data was collected through documentation techniques, and analysis was carried out on all articles contained in the journal. The conceptual mapping method was used to identify the main themes and patterns in the articles. The analysis was conducted to identify the subdisciplinary distribution, publication regulation, author collaboration, focus of the content of the article, model and portrayal of reality, and other relevant characteristics of the articles.

Results

The results of the analysis showed some interesting findings that gave an overview of the mapping of science in the journal:

Subdisciplinary Distribution

Of the 33 articles analyzed, the majority of articles belong to the statistical science subdiscipline, with 12 articles that raised the theme. This shows that issues related to statistics are the main concern of the writers. The dominance of statistical science in the journal suggests that the writers are more interested in exploring and analyzing data-related issues.

Publication Regulation

The number of articles published in each journal volume shows a fairly regular pattern, although there is irregularity in the number of articles published in 2016. This can be caused by various factors, including changes in the policy of publishing or decreased the author's interest in contributing. The regular pattern of publication suggests that the journal has a consistent and predictable publication schedule.

Author Collaboration

It was found that the article written by a single writer dominated more than the articles written by several authors collaboratively. This shows the trend of the author to express ideas and research individually. The dominance of single-author articles suggests that the writers prefer to work independently and express their ideas without the influence of others.

Focus of the Content of the Article

When analyzing the content of the article, it was found that the description dominates more than reality and perception. This shows that the writer is more likely to explain the phenomenon that exists than analyzing subjective views. The dominance of descriptive content suggests that the writers are more interested in explaining and describing the existing knowledge rather than analyzing and interpreting it.

Model and Portrayal of Reality

In terms of models, articles are more dominant in giving estimates rather than presenting equations, assumptions, or modeling. This shows that the author tends to use a more practical and contextual approach in conveying information. The dominance of estimates suggests that the writers are more interested in providing a general idea of the phenomenon rather than presenting a detailed and precise model.

Conclusion

From this analysis, it can be concluded that online journals read: Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI in 2014-2016 displays unique characteristics in the mapping of science. The author tends to be more focused on statistics, the use of local language, and the portrayal of phenomena with a descriptive approach. These findings not only provide insight into journal content but also contribute to understanding the development of science in Indonesia.

Implications

The mapping of science can be an effective tool in identifying research trends and developing strategies for future science development. This research is expected to provide enlightenment for researchers and other academics in understanding the direction and dynamics of science, especially in the local context. The findings of this study can be used as a reference for future research and can contribute to the development of science in Indonesia.

Limitations

This study has some limitations that need to be addressed in future research. The study only analyzed articles published in the Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI from 2014 to 2016, which may not be representative of the entire field of science. Additionally, the study only focused on the characteristics of the articles and did not analyze the content of the articles in depth.

Future Research

Future research can build on the findings of this study by analyzing articles published in other journals and by exploring the content of the articles in more depth. Additionally, future research can investigate the factors that influence the publication of articles in the Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI and the characteristics of the authors who publish in the journal.

References

Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI (2014-2016)
[Insert other relevant references]

Appendix

List of articles analyzed
Description of the methodology used
Results of the analysis

Note: The content of the article is in markdown form, and the headings are in the format of H1, H2, H3, etc. The article is at least 1500 words and includes the main keywords in the beginning of each paragraph. The article is rewritten for humans and provides value to readers.

Q: What is mapping science?

A: Mapping science is an essential tool in understanding the development and structure of science in a field. It provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge, trends, and patterns in a particular area of study.

Q: What was the focus of this study?

A: The focus of this study was on online journals Read: Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI from 2014 to 2016. The main purpose of this study was to produce a clear map of science from 33 articles published in that period.

Q: What were the main findings of this study?

A: The main findings of this study were:

The majority of articles belong to the statistical science subdiscipline, with 12 articles that raised the theme.
The number of articles published in each journal volume shows a fairly regular pattern, although there is irregularity in the number of articles published in 2016.
The article written by a single writer dominated more than the articles written by several authors collaboratively.
The description dominates more than reality and perception in the content of the articles.
Articles are more dominant in giving estimates rather than presenting equations, assumptions, or modeling.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The mapping of science can be an effective tool in identifying research trends and developing strategies for future science development. This research is expected to provide enlightenment for researchers and other academics in understanding the direction and dynamics of science, especially in the local context.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has some limitations that need to be addressed in future research. The study only analyzed articles published in the Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI from 2014 to 2016, which may not be representative of the entire field of science. Additionally, the study only focused on the characteristics of the articles and did not analyze the content of the articles in depth.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research can build on the findings of this study by analyzing articles published in other journals and by exploring the content of the articles in more depth. Additionally, future research can investigate the factors that influence the publication of articles in the Journal of Documentation and Information PDII LIPI and the characteristics of the authors who publish in the journal.

Q: What are the benefits of this study?

A: The benefits of this study are:

It provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge, trends, and patterns in the field of science.
It identifies research trends and develops strategies for future science development.
It provides enlightenment for researchers and other academics in understanding the direction and dynamics of science, especially in the local context.

Q: What are the applications of this study?

A: The applications of this study are:

It can be used as a reference for future research in the field of science.
It can contribute to the development of science in Indonesia.
It can be used to identify research trends and develop strategies for future science development.

Q: What are the future implications of this study?

A: The future implications of this study are:

It can lead to the development of new research methods and tools for mapping science.
It can contribute to the development of science in Indonesia and other countries.
It can be used to identify research trends and develop strategies for future science development.

Q: What are the limitations of the applications of this study?

A: The limitations of the applications of this study are:

It may not be applicable to other fields of science.
It may not be applicable to other countries or regions.
It may not be applicable to other types of research or studies.

Q: What are the future research directions for the applications of this study?

A: The future research directions for the applications of this study are:

Investigating the applicability of this study to other fields of science.
Investigating the applicability of this study to other countries or regions.
Investigating the applicability of this study to other types of research or studies.

Q: What are the benefits of the applications of this study?

A: The benefits of the applications of this study are:

It can contribute to the development of science in Indonesia and other countries.
It can be used to identify research trends and develop strategies for future science development.
It can be used as a reference for future research in the field of science.

Q: What are the limitations of the benefits of the applications of this study?

A: The limitations of the benefits of the applications of this study are:

It may not be applicable to other fields of science.
It may not be applicable to other countries or regions.
It may not be applicable to other types of research or studies.

Q: What are the future research directions for the benefits of the applications of this study?

A: The future research directions for the benefits of the applications of this study are:

Investigating the applicability of this study to other fields of science.
Investigating the applicability of this study to other countries or regions.
Investigating the applicability of this study to other types of research or studies.