Response to the Increase in BPJS Health Contribution Mandiri and the Sustainability of Membership in Medan Marelan District in 2020

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 27 views

Response to the Increase in BPJS Health Contribution Mandiri and the Sustainability of Membership in Medan Marelan District in 2020

Introduction

In 2020, the Health Social Security Organizing Agency (BPJS Health) officially raised contributions for BPJS Health Classes 1 and 2. This increase in contributions has sparked a mixed reaction from the community, with some participants expressing dissatisfaction with the quality of health services and the high costs associated with treatment. This study aims to investigate the response of BPJS Health Independent participants in Medan Marelan District to the increase in contributions and the sustainability of their participation.

Background

The BPJS Health program is a government-funded health insurance program that provides access to healthcare services for millions of Indonesians. The program is divided into three classes, with Class 1 being the most comprehensive and Class 3 being the most basic. In 2020, BPJS Health raised contributions for Classes 1 and 2, citing the need to improve the quality of health services and increase funding for the program.

Methodology

This study used a descriptive quantitative research method, with a population of all BPJS Mandiri Health Class 1, 2, and 3 participants in Medan Marelan District, totaling 24,835 people. A random sampling method was used to select 100 participants, who were then interviewed using a questionnaire to gather data.

Results

The results of the study showed that the majority of respondents (85%) objected to the increase in BPJS Health contributions, citing the high costs associated with treatment and the poor quality of health services. The number of family members registered as BPJS Health participants also directly affects the amount of contributions that must be paid every month. Respondents who rarely use BPJS Health services feel disadvantaged by the increase in contributions.

Despite objections, most of the respondents (90%) remained obedient to pay fees in accordance with the time specified by BPJS Health. They do not want to lose the rights of membership and benefits offered by BPJS Health. The need for health services is a major factor for them to remain participants.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that an increase in BPJS Health contributions has a significant impact on the perceptions and behavior of participants. Although still bound by the BPJS Health program, many participants feel dissatisfied with the services received and assume an increase in contributions is unfair.

Several factors contributed to the participants' objections to the increase in contributions, including:

The quality of health services that are not evenly distributed: The availability and quality of health services in various regions, especially in remote areas, is still not evenly distributed.
High treatment costs: Even though they have BPJS Health, many participants still have to pay additional costs for treatment, such as administrative costs, drug costs, and other additional costs.
The process of managing complicated and time-consuming files: Many participants complained about the complicated and time-consuming file management process, thus making them find it difficult to access BPJS Health services.

Suggestions

Based on the results of this study, the following suggestions can be made:

Improving the quality of health services: BPJS Health needs to improve the quality of health services evenly throughout Indonesia, with a focus on increasing access and quality of services in remote areas.
Reviewing the mechanism for determining contributions: BPJS Health needs to review the mechanism for determining contributions to be more fair and transparent. Determination of contributions must consider factors such as the level of participant income, the number of family members, and the needs of health services.
Facilitating the file management process: BPJS Health needs to facilitate the process of managing files and health services to be more efficient and easily accessed by participants.
Increasing transparency and accountability: BPJS Health needs to increase transparency and accountability in the management of funds and health insurance programs. This will build participant trust in BPJS Health.

Conclusion

Improving services and transparency is very important to maintain the sustainability of the BPJS Health program. Increasing the satisfaction of participants will also encourage compliance in payment of contributions and ensure the sustainability of the health insurance program for the whole community.

References

BPJS Health. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2010 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2007 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2005 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2003 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2002 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2000 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1997 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1996 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1995 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1994 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1993 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1992 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1991 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1990 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1989 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1988 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1987 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1986 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1985 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1984 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1983 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1982 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1981 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1980 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1979 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun
Q&A: Response to the Increase in BPJS Health Contribution Mandiri and the Sustainability of Membership in Medan Marelan District in 2020

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to investigate the response of BPJS Health Independent participants in Medan Marelan District to the increase in contributions and the sustainability of their participation.

Q: What is the background of the study?

A: The study was conducted in 2020, when the Health Social Security Organizing Agency (BPJS Health) officially raised contributions for BPJS Health Classes 1 and 2. This increase in contributions has sparked a mixed reaction from the community, with some participants expressing dissatisfaction with the quality of health services and the high costs associated with treatment.

Q: What is the methodology used in this study?

A: This study used a descriptive quantitative research method, with a population of all BPJS Mandiri Health Class 1, 2, and 3 participants in Medan Marelan District, totaling 24,835 people. A random sampling method was used to select 100 participants, who were then interviewed using a questionnaire to gather data.

Q: What are the results of the study?

A: The results of the study showed that the majority of respondents (85%) objected to the increase in BPJS Health contributions, citing the high costs associated with treatment and the poor quality of health services. Despite objections, most of the respondents (90%) remained obedient to pay fees in accordance with the time specified by BPJS Health.

Q: What are the factors that contributed to the participants' objections to the increase in contributions?

A: Several factors contributed to the participants' objections to the increase in contributions, including:

The quality of health services that are not evenly distributed: The availability and quality of health services in various regions, especially in remote areas, is still not evenly distributed.
High treatment costs: Even though they have BPJS Health, many participants still have to pay additional costs for treatment, such as administrative costs, drug costs, and other additional costs.
The process of managing complicated and time-consuming files: Many participants complained about the complicated and time-consuming file management process, thus making them find it difficult to access BPJS Health services.

Q: What are the suggestions made by the study?

A: Based on the results of this study, the following suggestions can be made:

Improving the quality of health services: BPJS Health needs to improve the quality of health services evenly throughout Indonesia, with a focus on increasing access and quality of services in remote areas.
Reviewing the mechanism for determining contributions: BPJS Health needs to review the mechanism for determining contributions to be more fair and transparent. Determination of contributions must consider factors such as the level of participant income, the number of family members, and the needs of health services.
Facilitating the file management process: BPJS Health needs to facilitate the process of managing files and health services to be more efficient and easily accessed by participants.
Increasing transparency and accountability: BPJS Health needs to increase transparency and accountability in the management of funds and health insurance programs. This will build participant trust in BPJS Health.

Q: What is the conclusion of the study?

A: Improving services and transparency is very important to maintain the sustainability of the BPJS Health program. Increasing the satisfaction of participants will also encourage compliance in payment of contributions and ensure the sustainability of the health insurance program for the whole community.

Additional Questions and Answers

Q: What are the implications of this study for BPJS Health?

A: The study highlights the need for BPJS Health to improve the quality of health services, review the mechanism for determining contributions, facilitate the file management process, and increase transparency and accountability in the management of funds and health insurance programs.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the study. Future studies should aim to investigate the response of BPJS Health participants in other regions and to explore the impact of the increase in contributions on the sustainability of the health insurance program.

Q: What are the recommendations for future studies?

A: Future studies should aim to investigate the response of BPJS Health participants in other regions and to explore the impact of the increase in contributions on the sustainability of the health insurance program. Additionally, future studies should aim to investigate the impact of the increase in contributions on the quality of health services and the level of participant satisfaction.