Promote Democracy and Participation

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 10 views

The Perception of People Aged 40 Years and Over to the Leadership of H.M. Suharto

Introduction

Good leadership is a crucial aspect of modern society, and it is the focus of attention today. People want a leader who can direct the organization towards efficient management while paying attention to the welfare and happiness of the led community. In the Indonesian context, ideal leadership is in accordance with the values of Pancasila, which prioritizes the principle of family and creating social balance. H.M. Suharto, as the second president of Indonesia, led the country for 32 years and has become an important figure in the history of Indonesian politics. This article aims to explore the perception of people aged 40 years and over to the leadership of H.M. Suharto, especially in the context of the application of the principles of Pancasila.

The Success and Challenges of the Policy H.M. Suharto

Research conducted in Medan Amplas sub-district shows that people aged 40 years and over have felt firsthand the policy impact issued by H.M. Suharto. By using descriptive methods, this research involves sampling purposively and stratified proportional sampling to explore public perception. The results showed that many respondents considered the development policies taken by H.M. Suharto were successful. The development programs carried out succeeded in increasing infrastructure and the economy, as well as creating social stability at that time. This policy is recognized as having a positive impact on the welfare of the community.

However, behind this success, there is criticism of the political policies implemented by H.M. Suharto. Many people consider that his leadership tends to be autocratic and does not provide space for democracy. This assessment arises from the fact that power is fully centered on H.M. Suharto, who often ignored the voice of the community in decision making. Therefore, although many feel the benefits of the development carried out, there is also dissatisfaction with the political aspects that are considered lacking in providing opportunities for people's participation.

The Autocratic Leadership of H.M. Suharto

The leadership of H.M. Suharto has been criticized for being autocratic and undemocratic. Many people feel that he ignored the voice of the community in decision making and concentrated power in his own hands. This has led to a lack of participation and representation in the decision-making process. The community feels that they have no say in the policies that affect their lives, and this has led to a sense of disillusionment and frustration.

The Impact of Autocratic Leadership on the Community

The autocratic leadership of H.M. Suharto has had a significant impact on the community. Many people feel that they have been marginalized and excluded from the decision-making process. This has led to a sense of powerlessness and helplessness, and many people feel that they have no control over their own lives. The community feels that they have been treated as subjects rather than citizens, and this has led to a sense of resentment and anger.

Community Perception of the Leadership of H.M. Suharto

Community perception of the leadership of H.M. Suharto was very diverse. Some see it as a successful leader in bringing change, while others criticize it because of the method of leadership that is considered undemocratic. Communities in Medan Amplas District, especially those aged 40 years and over, have a more complex view. They not only see the results of physical development, but also consider aspects of freedom and political rights.

The Importance of Democracy and Participation

Good leadership is not only measured by economic success alone, but also from how far a leader is able to hear and accommodate the aspirations of the people. Leaders are expected to not only create successful policies, but also create space for the community to participate in the decision-making process. The ideal Pancasila leadership is balanced in both aspects. Democracy and participation are essential components of good leadership, and they should be prioritized in every aspect of leadership in Indonesia.

Conclusion

Through this analysis, it can be concluded that the perception of people aged 40 years and over with the leadership of H.M. Suharto reflects a complex view, between the success of development and criticism of authoritarianism. This shows that the community expects leadership that is not only results-oriented, but also in a process that involves active participation in the community. By understanding this view, we can learn the importance of upholding the values of democracy and participation in every aspect of leadership in Indonesia.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

Promote Democracy and Participation: The government should prioritize democracy and participation in every aspect of leadership in Indonesia. This can be achieved by creating space for the community to participate in the decision-making process and by ensuring that the voice of the community is heard.
Improve Transparency and Accountability: The government should improve transparency and accountability in the decision-making process. This can be achieved by making information available to the public and by ensuring that those in power are accountable for their actions.
Foster a Culture of Participation: The government should foster a culture of participation in Indonesia. This can be achieved by promoting education and awareness about the importance of democracy and participation, and by creating opportunities for the community to participate in the decision-making process.

By implementing these recommendations, the government can promote good leadership that is based on the values of democracy and participation. This can lead to a more just and equitable society, where the voice of the community is heard and respected.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Perception of People Aged 40 Years and Over to the Leadership of H.M. Suharto

Q: What was the main finding of the research on the perception of people aged 40 years and over to the leadership of H.M. Suharto?

A: The main finding of the research was that the perception of people aged 40 years and over to the leadership of H.M. Suharto was complex, reflecting both the success of development policies and criticism of authoritarianism.

Q: What were the development policies implemented by H.M. Suharto that were considered successful?

A: The development policies implemented by H.M. Suharto that were considered successful included the development of infrastructure, the economy, and social stability. These policies were recognized as having a positive impact on the welfare of the community.

Q: What were the criticisms of the leadership of H.M. Suharto?

A: The criticisms of the leadership of H.M. Suharto included that his leadership was autocratic and undemocratic, and that he ignored the voice of the community in decision making. This led to a lack of participation and representation in the decision-making process.

Q: How did the autocratic leadership of H.M. Suharto impact the community?

A: The autocratic leadership of H.M. Suharto had a significant impact on the community, leading to a sense of powerlessness and helplessness. Many people felt that they had no control over their own lives and were treated as subjects rather than citizens.

Q: What is the importance of democracy and participation in leadership?

A: Democracy and participation are essential components of good leadership. Leaders are expected to not only create successful policies, but also create space for the community to participate in the decision-making process. The ideal Pancasila leadership is balanced in both aspects.

Q: What are the recommendations for promoting good leadership based on the values of democracy and participation?

A: The recommendations for promoting good leadership based on the values of democracy and participation include promoting democracy and participation, improving transparency and accountability, and fostering a culture of participation.

Q: How can the government promote democracy and participation in leadership?

A: The government can promote democracy and participation in leadership by creating space for the community to participate in the decision-making process, making information available to the public, and ensuring that those in power are accountable for their actions.

Q: What are the benefits of promoting democracy and participation in leadership?

A: The benefits of promoting democracy and participation in leadership include a more just and equitable society, where the voice of the community is heard and respected. This can lead to a more stable and prosperous society.

Q: How can the community participate in the decision-making process?

A: The community can participate in the decision-making process by attending public meetings, expressing their opinions and concerns, and engaging in advocacy and activism. They can also participate in local government and community organizations to make their voices heard.

Q: What are the challenges of promoting democracy and participation in leadership?

A: The challenges of promoting democracy and participation in leadership include the need to overcome entrenched power structures and interests, and to build the capacity of the community to participate in the decision-making process. It also requires a commitment to transparency and accountability.

Q: How can the government overcome the challenges of promoting democracy and participation in leadership?

A: The government can overcome the challenges of promoting democracy and participation in leadership by providing education and training to the community, building the capacity of local government and community organizations, and creating a culture of transparency and accountability.