Priority Handling of Drainage in Medan Baru District

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 41 views

# Priority Study of Drainage Handling Using the AHP Method in Medan Baru District

Introduction

Floods are one of the most significant problems faced by big cities in Indonesia, including Medan. The increasing population density and reduced green open land have led to inadequate drainage capacity, resulting in frequent flooding. The Medan City Government faces significant challenges in dealing with this issue due to limited budget constraints every year. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the important criteria and sub-criteria in determining the priority of drainage handling to ensure that drainage channels can function optimally.

Background of the Study

Medan, the capital city of North Sumatra, is one of the most populous cities in Indonesia. The city's rapid growth has led to an increase in population density, resulting in inadequate drainage capacity. The Medan City Government has been struggling to deal with the drainage problem, which has become a significant concern for the residents. The inadequate drainage capacity has resulted in frequent flooding, which has a significant impact on the residents' quality of life.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study is to analyze the important criteria and sub-criteria in determining the priority of drainage handling in Medan Baru District. The study aims to identify the relevant criteria and sub-criteria using the cut-off method and determine the priority of handling in the problematic drainage channel using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method.

Methodology

The study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze the data. The cut-off method was used to identify the relevant criteria and sub-criteria, while the AHP method was used to determine the priority of handling in the problematic drainage channel. The AHP method is a decision-making tool that helps to identify the most important criteria and sub-criteria in a complex decision-making process.

Results

The results of the cut-off analysis indicate that there are three main criteria that must be considered: technical, social, and cultural aspects. Each criterion has a different sub-criteria, such as the level of channel damage, drainage status, and area, height, and long inundation for technical aspects. For social aspects, sub-criteria include the population affected by flooding, traffic disruption, and economic impacts. As for the cultural aspects, the considered sub-criteria are the demands of the community and the level of community concern for the problem.

Priority Handling of Drainage in Medan Baru District

By using three criteria and eight sub-criteria, priority handling of ten alternative drainage in Medan Baru District is determined. The results show that drainage on Jalan Dr. Mansyur was a top priority with a score of 0.184, which is located close to the University of North Sumatra.

Sensitivity Analysis

To ensure that the results are consistent, sensitivity analysis is also carried out. The sensitivity analysis shows that the specified priorities remain valid, indicating that the results are robust and reliable.

Conclusion

This study recommends decision makers that the AHP method can be used as a rational analysis tool in determining the priority of handling drainage problems in an area. With this systematic approach, it is expected that efforts to handle floods and maintenance of drainage systems in Medan can be carried out more effectively and efficiently, given the increasing urgency of flood situations.

Recommendations

By focusing on relevant criteria and sub-criteria, the decision-making process in handling drainage can be more directed, so as to improve the quality of life of residents and reduce the risk of adverse flooding. The study recommends that the Medan City Government should use the AHP method to determine the priority of handling drainage problems in the city.

Limitations of the Study

The study has some limitations. The study only focused on Medan Baru District, and the results may not be applicable to other areas in Medan. Additionally, the study only used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, and the results may not be generalizable to other contexts.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on applying the AHP method to other areas in Medan to determine the priority of handling drainage problems. Additionally, future research should explore the use of other decision-making tools, such as the fuzzy logic method, to determine the priority of handling drainage problems.

References

[1] AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method
[2] Cut-off Method
[3] Drainage Handling
[4] Floods
[5] Medan Baru District
[6] Medan City Government
[7] North Sumatra
[8] University of North Sumatra

Keywords

AHP method
Cut-off method
Drainage handling
Floods
Medan Baru District
Medan City Government
North Sumatra
University of North Sumatra
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Priority Study of Drainage Handling Using the AHP Method in Medan Baru District

Q: What is the main problem faced by big cities in Indonesia, including Medan?

A: The main problem faced by big cities in Indonesia, including Medan, is frequent flooding due to inadequate drainage capacity.

Q: What is the cause of inadequate drainage capacity in Medan?

A: The cause of inadequate drainage capacity in Medan is the increasing population density and reduced green open land.

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to analyze the important criteria and sub-criteria in determining the priority of drainage handling in Medan Baru District.

Q: What method was used to identify the relevant criteria and sub-criteria?

A: The cut-off method was used to identify the relevant criteria and sub-criteria.

Q: What method was used to determine the priority of handling in the problematic drainage channel?

A: The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was used to determine the priority of handling in the problematic drainage channel.

Q: What are the three main criteria that must be considered in determining the priority of drainage handling?

A: The three main criteria that must be considered are technical, social, and cultural aspects.

Q: What are the sub-criteria for technical aspects?

A: The sub-criteria for technical aspects include the level of channel damage, drainage status, and area, height, and long inundation.

Q: What are the sub-criteria for social aspects?

A: The sub-criteria for social aspects include the population affected by flooding, traffic disruption, and economic impacts.

Q: What are the sub-criteria for cultural aspects?

A: The sub-criteria for cultural aspects include the demands of the community and the level of community concern for the problem.

Q: What is the top priority drainage in Medan Baru District?

A: The top priority drainage in Medan Baru District is located on Jalan Dr. Mansyur, with a score of 0.184.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it provides a systematic approach to determining the priority of handling drainage problems in an area, which can help to improve the quality of life of residents and reduce the risk of adverse flooding.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include the fact that it only focused on Medan Baru District and used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should focus on applying the AHP method to other areas in Medan to determine the priority of handling drainage problems and exploring the use of other decision-making tools.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study include using the AHP method to determine the priority of handling drainage problems in the city and focusing on relevant criteria and sub-criteria to improve the decision-making process.

Q: What are the keywords related to this study?

A: The keywords related to this study include AHP method, cut-off method, drainage handling, floods, Medan Baru District, Medan City Government, North Sumatra, and University of North Sumatra.

Q: What is the reference list for this study?

A: The reference list for this study includes [1] AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method, [2] Cut-off Method, [3] Drainage Handling, [4] Floods, [5] Medan Baru District, [6] Medan City Government, [7] North Sumatra, and [8] University of North Sumatra.