Limitations of Scope of Development and Supervision

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 93 views

Introduction

The Professional Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) plays a crucial role in the land registration system in Indonesia. The authority of PPAT is delegated by the National Land Agency (BPN), and as part of the system, PPAT must be fostered and supervised by the local Land Office, in this case, the Medan City Land Office. This guidance and supervision aims to ensure the implementation of PPAT tasks runs optimally, while preventing violations of the law which can lead to administrative sanctions.

The Medan City Land Office has a significant responsibility in ensuring that the PPATs under its supervision adhere to the rules and regulations governing land registration. However, the study found that the guidance and supervision of the existing 81 PPAT in the city of Medan has not been running optimally. Factors that influence this include the extent of Medan City, which makes supervision a challenge, and the limited personnel from the Medan City Land Office, which makes it difficult to provide adequate guidance and supervision.

Methodology

This study adopted the normative juridical method, which prioritizes the study of library law and is supported by interviews. With the nature of analytical descriptive research, it is hoped that this research can provide a systematic and detailed picture of the problems under study. Data analysis is carried out with a qualitative approach, where data is collected from related documents and analyzed by referring to applicable regulations. The conclusion is drawn deductively, starting from an understanding of the authority of BPN in fostering and overseeing PPAT based on Article 33 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning the Position of Land Deed Making.

Research Result

Limitations of Scope of Development and Supervision

In the city of Medan, guidance and supervision of the existing 81 PPAT has not been running optimally. Factors that influence are the extent of Medan City which makes supervision a challenge. Personnel from the Medan City Land Office are limited, so that guidance and supervision is not comparable to the number of existing PPAT.

The extent of Medan City is a significant challenge in providing guidance and supervision to PPATs. The city is a large urban area with a population of over 2.5 million people, and the land registration system is complex. The Medan City Land Office has a limited number of personnel, which makes it difficult to provide adequate guidance and supervision to the existing 81 PPAT.

Weaknesses of Rules and Reporting

In addition to regional factors, there are also problems related to the weaknesses of the rules. Some PPATs do not routinely submit reports on making their deed, which hinders the supervision process. This shows the need for tighter disciplinary enforcement in reporting PPAT activities.

The weaknesses of the rules and the lack of reporting from PPATs are significant challenges in providing guidance and supervision. The Medan City Land Office needs to strengthen the rules and regulations governing land registration and ensure that PPATs submit regular reports on their activities.

Recommendation

One solution to increase the effectiveness of coaching and supervision is to plan a systematic schedule for these activities. The Medan City Land Office needs to create adequate supporting facilities for guidance and supervision. Coaching can be done through seminars that discuss the latest developments in land regulations. Meanwhile, supervision should be carried out by examining a written deed report.

The Medan City Land Office should plan a systematic schedule for guidance and supervision, which includes regular meetings with PPATs and regular reporting of their activities. The office should also create adequate supporting facilities for guidance and supervision, such as training facilities and equipment.

Conclusion

Medan City Land Office in carrying out guidance and supervision should refer to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and PPAT position code of ethics. Through a more structured approach and in accordance with the rules, it is hoped that coaching and supervision of PPAT can run more effectively and provide benefits to the community and land registration systems in the city of Medan.

The Medan City Land Office has a significant responsibility in ensuring that the PPATs under its supervision adhere to the rules and regulations governing land registration. The office should refer to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and the PPAT position code of ethics in carrying out guidance and supervision. A more structured approach and adherence to the rules will ensure that coaching and supervision of PPAT run more effectively and provide benefits to the community and land registration systems in the city of Medan.

Implication

A deep understanding of PPAT's authority, duties, and responsibilities as well as maximum efforts from the Land Office to conduct guidance and supervision is very important to maintain the integrity of the land registration system and public trust in the PPAT profession.

The study highlights the importance of guidance and supervision in maintaining the integrity of the land registration system and public trust in the PPAT profession. A deep understanding of PPAT's authority, duties, and responsibilities, as well as maximum efforts from the Land Office to conduct guidance and supervision, is essential in ensuring that the land registration system runs smoothly and efficiently.

Limitation

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only focuses on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in the city of Medan. Secondly, the study only uses a qualitative approach in data analysis. Finally, the study only refers to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and the PPAT position code of ethics in carrying out guidance and supervision.

The study has several limitations, including the focus on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in the city of Medan, the use of a qualitative approach in data analysis, and the reference to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and the PPAT position code of ethics in carrying out guidance and supervision. Future studies should address these limitations and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the guidance and supervision of PPATs in Indonesia.

Future Research

Future research should focus on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in other cities in Indonesia. The study should also use a mixed-methods approach in data analysis, which includes both qualitative and quantitative methods. Finally, the study should refer to other regulations and laws governing land registration in Indonesia.

Future research should focus on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in other cities in Indonesia, using a mixed-methods approach in data analysis, and referring to other regulations and laws governing land registration in Indonesia. This will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the guidance and supervision of PPATs in Indonesia and help to improve the land registration system in the country.

Q: What is the role of the Professional Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) in the land registration system in Indonesia?

A: The PPAT plays a crucial role in the land registration system in Indonesia. The authority of PPAT is delegated by the National Land Agency (BPN), and as part of the system, PPAT must be fostered and supervised by the local Land Office, in this case, the Medan City Land Office.

Q: What are the challenges faced by the Medan City Land Office in providing guidance and supervision to PPATs?

A: The Medan City Land Office faces several challenges in providing guidance and supervision to PPATs, including the extent of Medan City, which makes supervision a challenge, and the limited personnel from the Medan City Land Office, which makes it difficult to provide adequate guidance and supervision.

Q: What are the weaknesses of the rules and regulations governing land registration in Indonesia?

A: The weaknesses of the rules and regulations governing land registration in Indonesia include the lack of reporting from PPATs, which hinders the supervision process, and the need for tighter disciplinary enforcement in reporting PPAT activities.

Q: What is the recommendation for improving the guidance and supervision of PPATs in the city of Medan?

A: One solution to increase the effectiveness of coaching and supervision is to plan a systematic schedule for these activities. The Medan City Land Office needs to create adequate supporting facilities for guidance and supervision. Coaching can be done through seminars that discuss the latest developments in land regulations. Meanwhile, supervision should be carried out by examining a written deed report.

Q: What is the importance of guidance and supervision in maintaining the integrity of the land registration system and public trust in the PPAT profession?

A: A deep understanding of PPAT's authority, duties, and responsibilities, as well as maximum efforts from the Land Office to conduct guidance and supervision, is essential in ensuring that the land registration system runs smoothly and efficiently.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the focus on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in the city of Medan, the use of a qualitative approach in data analysis, and the reference to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and the PPAT position code of ethics in carrying out guidance and supervision.

Q: What are the implications of this study for future research?

A: Future research should focus on the guidance and supervision of PPATs in other cities in Indonesia, using a mixed-methods approach in data analysis, and referring to other regulations and laws governing land registration in Indonesia.

Q: What are the benefits of this study for the community and land registration systems in the city of Medan?

A: This study provides a systematic and detailed picture of the problems under study, which can help to improve the guidance and supervision of PPATs in the city of Medan, and ultimately benefit the community and land registration systems in the city.

Q: What are the recommendations for the Medan City Land Office in carrying out guidance and supervision?

A: The Medan City Land Office should refer to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 and the PPAT position code of ethics in carrying out guidance and supervision. A more structured approach and adherence to the rules will ensure that coaching and supervision of PPAT run more effectively and provide benefits to the community and land registration systems in the city of Medan.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the National Land Agency (BPN) and the Ministry of Land and Spatial Planning?

A: This study highlights the importance of guidance and supervision in maintaining the integrity of the land registration system and public trust in the PPAT profession. The BPN and the Ministry of Land and Spatial Planning should take note of the challenges faced by the Medan City Land Office and take steps to address them.