Lack of Coordination and Integration

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 15 views

Analysis of the Integrated Emergency Management System in Handling Victims of Mount Sinabung Eruption in 2014: Challenges and Opportunities

Introduction

The 2014 eruption of Mount Sinabung was a devastating disaster that demanded a fast and integrated response. The number of victims and high emergency cases in the disaster area required a systematic management to minimize casualties and disability. In response to this need, the Ministry of Health developed the Integrated Emergency Management System (SPGDT-B), which aimed to provide a comprehensive approach to managing disaster victims. This study aimed to explore the experience of the victims of the 2014 Mount Sinabung eruption, especially those who experienced an emergency case, in an effort to understand how they were handled by officers. Furthermore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of the application of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency.

Background

Mount Sinabung is an active volcano located in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia. The volcano has been erupting intermittently since 2010, but the 2014 eruption was the most devastating, resulting in the deaths of over 16 people and displacing thousands of others. The eruption also caused widespread damage to infrastructure, agriculture, and the environment. The disaster highlighted the need for a robust and integrated emergency management system to respond to such disasters.

Methodology

This study used a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The study involved a survey of 100 victims of the 2014 Mount Sinabung eruption, as well as in-depth interviews with 20 officers involved in the disaster response. The survey aimed to gather information on the victims' experience of the disaster, including their access to medical services, the effectiveness of the emergency response, and their overall satisfaction with the response. The in-depth interviews aimed to gather more detailed information on the officers' experience of responding to the disaster, including their perceptions of the effectiveness of SPGDT-B and the challenges they faced in implementing it.

Results

The results of the study showed that the Karo Regency Government had not fully implemented SPGDT-B in handling disaster victims, both directly and indirectly. There were weaknesses in cross-sectoral and institutional planning in the disaster management plan developed by the government, both before, during, and after the disaster. The study identified several challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B, including:

Lack of Coordination and Integration

The lack of coordination and integration between various parties involved in disaster management, such as local governments, health institutions, and the community, became the main obstacle in the implementation of SPGDT-B. This lack of coordination resulted in delays in responding to the disaster, as well as a lack of clear communication and coordination between different agencies.

Lack of Resources

Human resources and limited health facilities in the disaster area were obstacles in providing fast and appropriate medical services to the victims. The study found that many victims were unable to access medical services due to the lack of resources, including medical personnel, equipment, and facilities.

Low Public Awareness

Public awareness of the importance of SPGDT-B and how to access it was still low, so many victims were late getting help. The study found that many victims were unaware of the existence of SPGDT-B and how to access it, which resulted in delays in responding to the disaster.

Opportunities and Recommendations

The study identified several opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including:

Capacity Building

Institutional capacity building, officers, and community in disaster management through training and simulations can increase the effectiveness of SPGDT-B. The study recommended that the government and other stakeholders provide training and capacity-building programs for officers and community members to improve their knowledge and skills in disaster management.

Emergency Plan Development

The development of an emergency plan that is comprehensive and integrated involves all stakeholders, including the government, health institutions, and the community, will strengthen the disaster management system in Karo Regency. The study recommended that the government and other stakeholders develop an emergency plan that is comprehensive and integrated, and that involves all stakeholders.

Increasing Community Participation

Increasing community participation in disaster management through education and training on SPGDT-B, as well as fostering volunteer groups, will strengthen the disaster management system at the community level. The study recommended that the government and other stakeholders increase community participation in disaster management through education and training on SPGDT-B, as well as fostering volunteer groups.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the Karo Regency Government had not fully implemented SPGDT-B in handling disaster victims, both directly and indirectly. The study identified several challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B, including lack of coordination and integration, lack of resources, and low public awareness. The study also identified several opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including capacity building, emergency plan development, and increasing community participation. By building a planned, integrated, and sustainable disaster management system, as well as involving all stakeholders, Karo Regency can minimize victims and losses due to disasters, as well as increasing preparedness in dealing with disasters in the future.

Recommendations for Future Research

This study provides several recommendations for future research, including:

Conducting a comprehensive review of the disaster management plan developed by the government to identify areas for improvement.
Conducting a survey of officers and community members to gather more information on their experience of the disaster and their perceptions of the effectiveness of SPGDT-B.
Conducting a case study of a successful disaster response to identify best practices and lessons learned.
Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of SPGDT-B to identify areas for cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study was limited to a single case study of the 2014 Mount Sinabung eruption.
The study relied on a survey of victims and in-depth interviews with officers, which may not be representative of the broader population.
The study did not conduct a comprehensive review of the disaster management plan developed by the government.
The study did not conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of SPGDT-B.

Future Directions

This study provides several future directions for research, including:

Conducting a comprehensive review of the disaster management plan developed by the government to identify areas for improvement.
Conducting a survey of officers and community members to gather more information on their experience of the disaster and their perceptions of the effectiveness of SPGDT-B.
Conducting a case study of a successful disaster response to identify best practices and lessons learned.
Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of SPGDT-B to identify areas for cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the integrated emergency management system in handling victims of Mount Sinabung eruption in 2014. The study identified several challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B, including lack of coordination and integration, lack of resources, and low public awareness. The study also identified several opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including capacity building, emergency plan development, and increasing community participation. By building a planned, integrated, and sustainable disaster management system, as well as involving all stakeholders, Karo Regency can minimize victims and losses due to disasters, as well as increasing preparedness in dealing with disasters in the future.
Q&A: Analysis of the Integrated Emergency Management System in Handling Victims of Mount Sinabung Eruption in 2014

Introduction

The 2014 eruption of Mount Sinabung was a devastating disaster that demanded a fast and integrated response. The number of victims and high emergency cases in the disaster area required a systematic management to minimize casualties and disability. In response to this need, the Ministry of Health developed the Integrated Emergency Management System (SPGDT-B), which aimed to provide a comprehensive approach to managing disaster victims. This Q&A article aims to provide answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about the analysis of the integrated emergency management system in handling victims of Mount Sinabung eruption in 2014.

Q: What is the Integrated Emergency Management System (SPGDT-B)?

A: The Integrated Emergency Management System (SPGDT-B) is a comprehensive approach to managing disaster victims. It is a system that involves the coordination and integration of various parties, including local governments, health institutions, and the community, to provide fast and appropriate medical services to victims.

Q: What were the challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency?

A: The study identified several challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including lack of coordination and integration, lack of resources, and low public awareness. These challenges resulted in delays in responding to the disaster, as well as a lack of clear communication and coordination between different agencies.

Q: What are the opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency?

A: The study identified several opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including capacity building, emergency plan development, and increasing community participation. These recommendations aim to strengthen the disaster management system in Karo Regency and minimize victims and losses due to disasters.

Q: What is the importance of capacity building in disaster management?

A: Capacity building is essential in disaster management as it enables officers and community members to develop the knowledge, skills, and competencies needed to respond effectively to disasters. Capacity building can be achieved through training and simulations, which can increase the effectiveness of SPGDT-B.

Q: What is the role of emergency plan development in disaster management?

A: Emergency plan development is critical in disaster management as it provides a comprehensive and integrated approach to responding to disasters. An emergency plan should involve all stakeholders, including the government, health institutions, and the community, to ensure that all parties are aware of their roles and responsibilities in responding to disasters.

Q: How can community participation be increased in disaster management?

A: Community participation can be increased in disaster management through education and training on SPGDT-B, as well as fostering volunteer groups. Community participation is essential in disaster management as it enables community members to take an active role in responding to disasters and minimizing losses.

Q: What are the benefits of a planned, integrated, and sustainable disaster management system?

A: A planned, integrated, and sustainable disaster management system can minimize victims and losses due to disasters, as well as increase preparedness in dealing with disasters in the future. A well-planned disaster management system can also reduce the economic and social impacts of disasters.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the reliance on a single case study of the 2014 Mount Sinabung eruption, the use of a survey of victims and in-depth interviews with officers, and the lack of a comprehensive review of the disaster management plan developed by the government.

Q: What are the future directions for research?

A: The study provides several future directions for research, including conducting a comprehensive review of the disaster management plan developed by the government, conducting a survey of officers and community members, conducting a case study of a successful disaster response, and conducting a cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of SPGDT-B.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this Q&A article provides answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about the analysis of the integrated emergency management system in handling victims of Mount Sinabung eruption in 2014. The study identified several challenges in the implementation of SPGDT-B, including lack of coordination and integration, lack of resources, and low public awareness. The study also identified several opportunities and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of SPGDT-B in Karo Regency, including capacity building, emergency plan development, and increasing community participation. By building a planned, integrated, and sustainable disaster management system, as well as involving all stakeholders, Karo Regency can minimize victims and losses due to disasters, as well as increasing preparedness in dealing with disasters in the future.