Improving coordination between relevant agencies

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 60 views

Introduction

The waters of the east coast of North Sumatra are a vital source of marine resources, providing a significant contribution to the country's economy. However, the increasing cases of fish theft in this region pose a significant threat to the preservation of these resources. The current approach to addressing these violations, which involves mild criminal sanctions, has proven to be ineffective in deterring perpetrators. This study aims to explore the functionalization of criminal law in fisheries criminal acts, with a focus on the cases of fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra.

Background

The fisheries sector is a critical component of Indonesia's economy, providing a significant source of income for millions of people. However, the sector is also plagued by various problems, including overfishing, destructive fishing practices, and fish theft. The latter, in particular, has become a significant concern in recent years, with numerous cases reported in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra. The lack of effective law enforcement and supervision has contributed to the proliferation of fish theft, which not only affects the livelihoods of fishermen but also threatens the preservation of marine resources.

Theoretical Framework

The functionalization of criminal law in fisheries criminal acts can be understood through the lens of normative juridical and sociological juridical approaches. The normative juridical approach focuses on the legal structure and the obligations and duties of institutions related to fisheries. This approach highlights the importance of clear regulations and laws that govern the fisheries sector, as well as the need for effective enforcement mechanisms. The sociological juridical approach, on the other hand, examines the social and cultural context in which fisheries problems arise. This approach recognizes the importance of understanding the behaviors and attitudes of people and law enforcement officials in dealing with fisheries issues.

Methodology

This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The primary data collection methods included literature studies, field studies, questionnaires, and interviews with fishermen and various related parties, such as the Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Office, the Indonesian Navy, Prosecutors, Courts, and Fishermen Organizations. The secondary data collection methods involved the analysis of existing regulations, laws, and reports related to fisheries issues.

Results

The results of this study showed that the functionalization of criminal law in fisheries criminal acts can be seen from several aspects. Firstly, in the legal structure, there are obligations and duties of institutions related to fisheries. Secondly, from the substance, there are a number of regulations governing fisheries issues, including records of fisheries criminal cases that occurred in the region in the 2002-2003 period. Thirdly, in legal culture, it can be seen how people and law enforcement officials behave in dealing with fisheries problems.

However, there are various obstacles in the application of criminal law in the fisheries sector. Some of them are the lack of coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, limited facilities and infrastructure, as well as the weak implementation of sanctions for fish theft. Sanctions imposed tend to be light, which adds to the impression that law enforcement in this sector is not serious.

Discussion

The results of this study highlight the importance of functionalizing criminal law in fisheries criminal acts to prevent the practice of illegal fishing. The lack of coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, limited facilities and infrastructure, and the weak implementation of sanctions for fish theft are significant obstacles that need to be addressed. To overcome these obstacles, strategic steps are needed, including improving coordination between relevant agencies, strengthening the infrastructure of supporting law enforcement, and increasing the firmness in the imposition of sanctions for law violators in the fisheries sector.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated the importance of functionalizing criminal law in fisheries criminal acts to prevent the practice of illegal fishing. The results of this study have highlighted the need for improved coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, as well as the need for stronger sanctions for law violators in the fisheries sector. By addressing these obstacles, it is expected that the practice of fish theft in the east coast of North Sumatra can be minimized, and the preservation of marine resources can be maintained.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Improving coordination between relevant agencies: The government should improve coordination between relevant agencies, including the Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Office, the Indonesian Navy, Prosecutors, Courts, and Fishermen Organizations, to ensure effective law enforcement and supervision in the fisheries sector.
Strengthening the infrastructure of supporting law enforcement: The government should strengthen the infrastructure of supporting law enforcement, including the provision of adequate facilities and equipment, to ensure effective law enforcement and supervision in the fisheries sector.
Increasing the firmness in the imposition of sanctions for law violators: The government should increase the firmness in the imposition of sanctions for law violators in the fisheries sector, including the imposition of heavier fines and longer prison sentences, to deter perpetrators and prevent the practice of illegal fishing.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that the practice of fish theft in the east coast of North Sumatra can be minimized, and the preservation of marine resources can be maintained.

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the importance of functionalizing criminal law in fisheries criminal acts to prevent the practice of illegal fishing. In this article, we will answer some of the frequently asked questions related to this topic.

Q: What is the main problem with the current approach to addressing fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra?

A: The main problem with the current approach is that it involves mild criminal sanctions, which are not effective in deterring perpetrators. The lack of coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, limited facilities and infrastructure, and the weak implementation of sanctions for fish theft are significant obstacles that need to be addressed.

Q: What are the consequences of fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra?

A: The consequences of fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra are significant. Fish theft not only affects the livelihoods of fishermen but also threatens the preservation of marine resources. The loss of marine resources can have a ripple effect on the entire ecosystem, leading to the decline of fish populations and the loss of biodiversity.

Q: What are the key factors that contribute to the practice of fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra?

A: The key factors that contribute to the practice of fish theft in the eastern coast waters of North Sumatra include the lack of coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, limited facilities and infrastructure, and the weak implementation of sanctions for fish theft. Additionally, the lack of awareness and education among fishermen and the general public about the importance of sustainable fishing practices also contributes to the practice of fish theft.

Q: What are the benefits of functionalizing criminal law in fisheries criminal acts?

A: The benefits of functionalizing criminal law in fisheries criminal acts include the prevention of the practice of illegal fishing, the protection of marine resources, and the promotion of sustainable fishing practices. By functionalizing criminal law, the government can ensure that the fisheries sector is governed by clear regulations and laws, and that law enforcement and supervision are effective in preventing the practice of fish theft.

Q: What are the challenges of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts?

A: The challenges of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts include the need for improved coordination and supervision in handling fisheries problems, the need for stronger sanctions for law violators, and the need for increased awareness and education among fishermen and the general public about the importance of sustainable fishing practices.

Q: What are the recommendations for addressing the challenges of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts?

A: The recommendations for addressing the challenges of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts include improving coordination between relevant agencies, strengthening the infrastructure of supporting law enforcement, and increasing the firmness in the imposition of sanctions for law violators. Additionally, increasing awareness and education among fishermen and the general public about the importance of sustainable fishing practices is also essential.

Q: What is the expected outcome of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts?

A: The expected outcome of implementing functionalized criminal law in fisheries criminal acts is the prevention of the practice of illegal fishing, the protection of marine resources, and the promotion of sustainable fishing practices. By functionalizing criminal law, the government can ensure that the fisheries sector is governed by clear regulations and laws, and that law enforcement and supervision are effective in preventing the practice of fish theft.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the functionalization of criminal law in fisheries criminal acts is essential for preventing the practice of illegal fishing and protecting marine resources. By addressing the challenges of implementing functionalized criminal law, the government can ensure that the fisheries sector is governed by clear regulations and laws, and that law enforcement and supervision are effective in preventing the practice of fish theft.