Greater transparency in the implementation of the death penalty

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 5 views

The Death Penalty: A Comparative Analysis of Provisions in Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law

The death penalty has been a contentious issue for centuries, with proponents and opponents presenting various arguments for and against its implementation. In Indonesia, the death penalty remains a topic of debate, with many questioning its effectiveness in preventing crime and its compatibility with human rights. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the provisions of capital punishment in Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law, highlighting both the similarities and differences between the two.

Death Penalty Regulation in Indonesian Positive Law and Islamic Law

Indonesian positive law regulates capital punishment in the Criminal Code (KUHP), which determines the types of crimes that can be subject to the death penalty and outlines the procedures for its implementation. The death penalty in Indonesia is handed down by the court through a transparent legal process, where the judge plays a crucial role in determining the verdict. In contrast, Islamic law regulates the death penalty through the Qur'an and Hadith, with the process of imposing this sentence often involving the victim's family.

Equations in the Death Criminal Provisions

Despite the differences in their sources and implementation procedures, there are some similarities between the death penalty provisions in Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law. Both systems aim to maintain social order and ensure the survival of society, with the death penalty serving as a means to achieve these goals. Additionally, both systems rely on local authorities to supervise the implementation of the death penalty, ensuring that the sentence is carried out fairly and in accordance with applicable procedures.

Differences in the Death Criminal Provisions

While there are similarities between the two systems, there are also significant differences. One of the main differences lies in the source of law used. The death penalty in Islamic law is based on the Qur'an and Hadith, whereas Indonesian criminal law is sourced from the Criminal Code, a product of legislation. Furthermore, the determination of the implementation of the death penalty differs between the two systems, with Islamic law allowing for decisions to be influenced by the families of victims, whereas Indonesian criminal law relies solely on the judge's decision based on the facts and evidence presented.

Another difference lies in the characteristics of the death penalty itself. In Indonesia, capital punishment can be reviewed and changed over time, whereas in Islamic law, the death penalty is eternal and cannot be altered. This difference highlights the dynamic nature of Indonesian law, which is subject to change and adaptation, whereas Islamic law is based on a fixed and unchanging set of principles.

Conclusion

The comparison of the provisions of capital punishment in Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law reveals both similarities and differences between the two systems. While both systems aim to maintain social order and ensure the survival of society, they differ significantly in their sources of law, implementation procedures, and the characteristics of the death penalty. This analysis highlights the complexity of the law and ethics surrounding the death sentence, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the issues involved.

Recommendations

Based on this analysis, several recommendations can be made:

Greater transparency in the implementation of the death penalty: Both Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law should strive for greater transparency in the implementation of the death penalty, ensuring that the process is fair and in accordance with applicable procedures.
Review of the death penalty provisions: Indonesian criminal law should review its death penalty provisions to ensure that they are in line with international human rights standards and that they are effective in preventing crime.
Education and awareness: Educational programs should be implemented to raise awareness about the death penalty and its implications, promoting a more informed and nuanced discussion about the issue.

By paying attention to these recommendations, it is hoped that the community can better understand the complexity of the law and ethics surrounding the death sentence, ultimately contributing to a more informed and compassionate discussion about this contentious issue.
Frequently Asked Questions: Death Penalty in Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law

The death penalty remains a contentious issue in Indonesia, with many questions and concerns surrounding its implementation. In this article, we aim to provide answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law.

Q: What is the purpose of the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law?

A: The purpose of the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law is to maintain social order and ensure the survival of society. The death penalty is considered a basic criminal sentence, serving as a means to achieve these goals.

Q: How is the death penalty implemented in Indonesian criminal law?

A: The death penalty in Indonesian criminal law is implemented through a transparent legal process, where the judge plays a crucial role in determining the verdict. The process involves a thorough investigation, trial, and appeal, ensuring that the sentence is carried out fairly and in accordance with applicable procedures.

Q: What are the types of crimes that can be subject to the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law?

A: The types of crimes that can be subject to the death penalty in Indonesian criminal law are determined by the Criminal Code (KUHP). These crimes include murder, treason, and other serious offenses that pose a threat to society.

Q: Can the death penalty be reviewed and changed in Indonesian criminal law?

A: Yes, the death penalty can be reviewed and changed in Indonesian criminal law. The sentence can be appealed, and the court may reconsider the case based on new evidence or changing circumstances.

Q: What is the role of the victim's family in the implementation of the death penalty in Islamic law?

A: In Islamic law, the victim's family plays an important role in the implementation of the death penalty. In certain cases, the family may choose to forgive the perpetrator, which can lead to a reduction or commutation of the sentence.

Q: Can the death penalty be imposed without the consent of the victim's family in Islamic law?

A: No, the death penalty cannot be imposed without the consent of the victim's family in Islamic law. The family's consent is a crucial factor in determining whether the perpetrator will be sentenced to death or forgiven.

Q: Is the death penalty eternal in Islamic law?

A: Yes, the death penalty is considered eternal in Islamic law. Once the sentence is imposed, it cannot be changed or commuted, regardless of changing circumstances or new evidence.

Q: Can the death penalty be imposed on non-Muslims in Islamic law?

A: No, the death penalty cannot be imposed on non-Muslims in Islamic law. The application of the death penalty is limited to Muslims who have committed serious offenses against the Shari'a.

Q: What are the implications of the death penalty for human rights in Indonesia?

A: The death penalty has significant implications for human rights in Indonesia. The implementation of the death penalty raises concerns about the right to life, the right to a fair trial, and the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

Q: What can be done to address the concerns surrounding the death penalty in Indonesia?

A: To address the concerns surrounding the death penalty in Indonesia, several steps can be taken. These include:

Greater transparency in the implementation of the death penalty
Review of the death penalty provisions to ensure they are in line with international human rights standards
Education and awareness programs to promote a more informed and nuanced discussion about the death penalty
Advocacy for the abolition of the death penalty, or at least its restriction to the most serious crimes

By addressing these concerns and implementing reforms, Indonesia can work towards a more just and compassionate system of justice.