Functions of Interruptions

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 93 views

Introduction

The Indonesia Lawyers Club is a popular television talk program that brings together eleven participants, including the Indonesian President Lawyers Club, to engage in lively discussions on various legal and social issues. The program is known for its intense and dynamic interactions among participants, which often reflect strong differences of opinion regarding the issues discussed. However, one aspect of the program that has garnered significant attention is the frequency and type of interruptions that occur during the discussions. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the types and functions of interruptions that occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club, and to understand the significance of these interruptions in the context of the discussion.

Methodology

To achieve the goals of this study, researchers employed qualitative descriptive methods. This method was chosen because the data collected consists of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences, which directly reflect the pattern of communication in the event. The data was collected from a total of 11 episodes of the Indonesia Lawyers Club television talk program, which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were then analyzed to identify the types and functions of interruptions that occurred during the discussions.

Types of Interruptions

The results of the analysis showed that there were four types of interruptions that often occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club:

1. Simple Interruption (Simple Interruption - Si)

This type of interruption is the most dominant, with 20 events or 51.28% of total interruption. Simple interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another without any prior warning or indication that they intend to do so. This type of interruption is often characterized by a sudden and abrupt change in the conversation, which can be jarring and disrupt the flow of the discussion.

2. Overlap Interruption (OI)

This type of interruption occurs 9 times or 23.08%. Overlap interruptions occur when one participant starts speaking while another participant is still speaking, but without interrupting the other participant's turn. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

3. Including Interruption (Butting-in Interruption - BI)

This type of interruption is recorded 6 events or 15.38%. Including interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another by including their own thoughts or opinions in the conversation. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

4. Silent Interruption (Silent Interruption - SLI)

This type of interruption occurs 4 times or 10.26%. Silent interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another without making any noise or disturbance. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

Functions of Interruptions

In addition to identifying the types of interruptions that occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club, this study also found six interruption functions used in the discussion:

1. Agreement (Agreement - AGR)

This function occurs 2 events (5.13%). Agreement interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another to express agreement with their opinion or statement. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

2. Clarification (Clarification - CLA)

This function occurs 11 events (28.21%). Clarification interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another to clarify or seek clarification on a point or statement. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

3. Assistance (Assistance - Ass)

This function occurs 1 event (2.56%). Assistance interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another to offer assistance or provide help with a point or statement. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

4. Take a Turn (Floor Taking - FT)

This function occurs 3 events (7.69%). Take a turn interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another to take a turn in the conversation. This type of interruption is often characterized by a sudden and abrupt change in the conversation, which can be jarring and disrupt the flow of the discussion.

5. Topic Shift (Tangenialization - Tan)

This function occurs 1 event (2.56%). Topic shift interruptions occur when one participant interrupts another to shift the topic of the conversation. This type of interruption is often characterized by a subtle and nuanced change in the conversation, which can be difficult to detect.

Conclusion

The results of this study show that interruptions, especially disagreement, play an important role in the discussion format in the Indonesia Lawyers Club. Interruptions are not just a disturbance, but also a tool to express different positions and perspectives in a dialogue. This indicates the dynamics of intense interactions among participants, who often reflect strong differences of opinion regarding the issues discussed. The importance of understanding the type and function of interruption in this context is to provide deeper insight about how communication takes place in an environment that prioritizes debate and discussion. Thus, this research is not only beneficial for academics, but also for viewers who are interested in the dynamics of social interaction on the screen.

Implications

The findings of this study have several implications for our understanding of communication in the Indonesia Lawyers Club. Firstly, the study highlights the importance of interruptions in facilitating debate and discussion in the program. Secondly, the study shows that interruptions can be a tool for expressing different positions and perspectives in a dialogue. Finally, the study suggests that understanding the type and function of interruption in this context can provide deeper insight into how communication takes place in an environment that prioritizes debate and discussion.

Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study was limited to a sample of 11 episodes of the Indonesia Lawyers Club television talk program. Secondly, the study relied on qualitative descriptive methods, which may not be suitable for all types of data. Finally, the study did not control for other variables that may have influenced the results.

Future Research

Future research should aim to replicate and extend the findings of this study. Firstly, researchers should investigate the types and functions of interruptions in other contexts, such as in academic or professional settings. Secondly, researchers should explore the role of interruptions in facilitating debate and discussion in other environments. Finally, researchers should investigate the impact of interruptions on communication outcomes, such as understanding and agreement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides an in-depth analysis of the types and functions of interruptions that occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club. The study shows that interruptions, especially disagreement, play an important role in the discussion format in the program. The study highlights the importance of understanding the type and function of interruption in this context, and suggests that this research is not only beneficial for academics, but also for viewers who are interested in the dynamics of social interaction on the screen.

Introduction

The Indonesia Lawyers Club is a popular television talk program that brings together eleven participants, including the Indonesian President Lawyers Club, to engage in lively discussions on various legal and social issues. The program is known for its intense and dynamic interactions among participants, which often reflect strong differences of opinion regarding the issues discussed. However, one aspect of the program that has garnered significant attention is the frequency and type of interruptions that occur during the discussions. In this article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about interruptions in the Indonesia Lawyers Club.

Q: What is an interruption in the context of the Indonesia Lawyers Club?

A: An interruption in the context of the Indonesia Lawyers Club refers to a situation where one participant interrupts another participant's turn in the conversation. This can be done in various ways, such as by speaking over the other participant, by inserting one's own thoughts or opinions, or by changing the subject.

Q: What are the different types of interruptions that occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club?

A: The study found four types of interruptions that occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club:

Simple Interruption (Simple Interruption - Si): This type of interruption is the most dominant, with 20 events or 51.28% of total interruption.
Overlap Interruption (OI): This type of interruption occurs 9 times or 23.08%.
Including Interruption (Butting-in Interruption - BI): This type of interruption is recorded 6 events or 15.38%.
Silent Interruption (Silent Interruption - SLI): This type of interruption occurs 4 times or 10.26%.

Q: What are the functions of interruptions in the Indonesia Lawyers Club?

A: The study found six functions of interruptions in the Indonesia Lawyers Club:

Agreement (Agreement - AGR): This function occurs 2 events (5.13%).
Clarification (Clarification - CLA): This function occurs 11 events (28.21%).
Assistance (Assistance - Ass): This function occurs 1 event (2.56%).
Take a Turn (Floor Taking - FT): This function occurs 3 events (7.69%).
Topic Shift (Tangenialization - Tan): This function occurs 1 event (2.56%).

Q: Why do interruptions occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club?

A: Interruptions occur in the Indonesia Lawyers Club for various reasons, including:

To express disagreement: Interruptions can be used to express disagreement with another participant's opinion or statement.
To clarify a point: Interruptions can be used to clarify a point or statement that was not clear.
To take a turn: Interruptions can be used to take a turn in the conversation.
To shift the topic: Interruptions can be used to shift the topic of the conversation.

Q: What are the implications of interruptions in the Indonesia Lawyers Club?

A: The study suggests that interruptions in the Indonesia Lawyers Club have several implications, including:

Facilitating debate and discussion: Interruptions can facilitate debate and discussion by allowing participants to express their opinions and engage in lively discussions.
Expressing different positions and perspectives: Interruptions can be used to express different positions and perspectives in a dialogue.
Providing deeper insight into communication: Understanding the type and function of interruption in this context can provide deeper insight into how communication takes place in an environment that prioritizes debate and discussion.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including:

Sample size: The study was limited to a sample of 11 episodes of the Indonesia Lawyers Club television talk program.
Methodology: The study relied on qualitative descriptive methods, which may not be suitable for all types of data.
Control variables: The study did not control for other variables that may have influenced the results.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to replicate and extend the findings of this study. Some potential future research directions include:

Investigating the types and functions of interruptions in other contexts: Researchers should investigate the types and functions of interruptions in other contexts, such as in academic or professional settings.
Exploring the role of interruptions in facilitating debate and discussion: Researchers should explore the role of interruptions in facilitating debate and discussion in other environments.
Investigating the impact of interruptions on communication outcomes: Researchers should investigate the impact of interruptions on communication outcomes, such as understanding and agreement.