Analysis of Fertilizer Subsidized Policies

Oct 13, 2025 by magicalceylontours.com 71 views

The Effectiveness of the SBY-Boediono Political Concept Regarding Fertilizer Subsidy Policies Against Farmers Between 2009-2011

Introduction

Agriculture is the backbone of the Indonesian economy, particularly in rural areas. Unfortunately, the welfare of Indonesian farmers remains far from ideal. This is reflected in the data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), which shows an increase in the number of poor people, especially in rural areas, with the majority being farmers. To address this issue, the government has implemented a fertilizer subsidy program since 2003, aiming to improve the welfare of farmers by facilitating more affordable fertilizer access.

Background

The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era (2009-2011) has been a crucial policy in supporting the agricultural sector. The program's goal is to improve the welfare of farmers by providing them with more affordable fertilizer access. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidized programs in the SBY-Boediono leadership era, with a case study in Pagar Jati Village, Lubuk Pakam District, Deli Serdang Regency.

Analysis of Fertilizer Subsidized Policies

The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era has several key points:

Subsidized Mechanism: Subsidies are given through the highest retail price determination mechanism (HET) of subsidized fertilizer.
Types of Subsidized Fertilizer: Types of fertilizers that receive subsidies include Urea, SP-36, ZA, and NPK.
Recipient Target: This program targets small farmers, with certain criteria.

However, this program does not escape criticism. Some of the weaknesses found include:

Uneven Distribution: Fertilizer subsidies often do not reach the hands of small farmers, especially in remote areas.
Subsidized Leaks: There is a practice of distribution of subsidized fertilizer to those who are not entitled, such as industry and traders.
Lack of Supervision: Weak surveillance systems cause various deviations in the fertilizer subsidy program.

Policy Effectiveness in Pagar Jati Village

Research in Pagar Jati Village found that the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era had several impacts:

Increasing Access to Fertilizer: Farmers in Pagar Jati Village feel the benefits of this program through easier and affordable fertilizer access.
Increased Productivity: Farmers' harvests have increased due to more optimal use of fertilizer.
Useful Gaps: There is a gap in access and benefits of this program, where small farmers with limited land are more difficult to obtain subsidized fertilizer.

Recommendation

To increase the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program in the future, some recommendations to consider:

Increased Transparency and Accountability: The application of an integrated information system to monitor the distribution of subsidized fertilizer and increase program transparency.
Increasing Subsidized Governance: Strengthening supervision and law enforcement to prevent inappropriate leakage and distribution.
Increasing Farmers' Capacity: Training and counseling for farmers about how to use effective and efficient fertilizer.
Increasing Financing Access: Facilitating credit access for farmers to increase business capital, including for fertilizer purchases.

Conclusion

The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era has a positive impact in increasing the access and productivity of farmers in Pagar Jati Village. However, this program also experienced various obstacles, such as uneven distribution and leakage of subsidies. To achieve more effective program objectives, it is necessary to improve the system and governance of the fertilizer subsidy program to be more transparent, accountable, and directed to the right recipient target.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Case Study: The study is limited to a case study in Pagar Jati Village, which may not be representative of other areas.
Data Availability: The study relies on secondary data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date.
Methodology: The study uses a qualitative approach, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Future Research Directions

Future research should consider the following directions:

Quantitative Analysis: Conducting a quantitative analysis to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Comparative Study: Conducting a comparative study to compare the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program in different areas.
Policy Evaluation: Conducting a policy evaluation to assess the impact of the fertilizer subsidy program on farmers' welfare.

References

Central Statistics Agency (BPS). (2020). Indonesia in Figures 2020.
Ministry of Agriculture. (2011). Fertilizer Subsidy Program in the SBY-Boediono Era.
World Bank. (2019). Indonesia: Agriculture and Rural Development.

Appendices

Appendix A: List of interviewees and their contact information.
Appendix B: List of documents and data sources used in the study.
Appendix C: List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the study.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Effectiveness of the SBY-Boediono Political Concept Regarding Fertilizer Subsidy Policies Against Farmers Between 2009-2011

Q: What is the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era?

A: The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era is a government initiative aimed at improving the welfare of farmers by providing them with more affordable fertilizer access.

Q: What are the key points of the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era?

A: The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era has several key points, including:

Subsidized Mechanism: Subsidies are given through the highest retail price determination mechanism (HET) of subsidized fertilizer.
Types of Subsidized Fertilizer: Types of fertilizers that receive subsidies include Urea, SP-36, ZA, and NPK.
Recipient Target: This program targets small farmers, with certain criteria.

Q: What are the weaknesses of the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era?

A: The fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era has several weaknesses, including:

Uneven Distribution: Fertilizer subsidies often do not reach the hands of small farmers, especially in remote areas.
Subsidized Leaks: There is a practice of distribution of subsidized fertilizer to those who are not entitled, such as industry and traders.
Lack of Supervision: Weak surveillance systems cause various deviations in the fertilizer subsidy program.

Q: What are the impacts of the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era in Pagar Jati Village?

A: Research in Pagar Jati Village found that the fertilizer subsidy program in the SBY-Boediono era had several impacts, including:

Increasing Access to Fertilizer: Farmers in Pagar Jati Village feel the benefits of this program through easier and affordable fertilizer access.
Increased Productivity: Farmers' harvests have increased due to more optimal use of fertilizer.
Useful Gaps: There is a gap in access and benefits of this program, where small farmers with limited land are more difficult to obtain subsidized fertilizer.

Q: What are the recommendations to increase the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program in the future?

A: To increase the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program in the future, some recommendations to consider:

Increased Transparency and Accountability: The application of an integrated information system to monitor the distribution of subsidized fertilizer and increase program transparency.
Increasing Subsidized Governance: Strengthening supervision and law enforcement to prevent inappropriate leakage and distribution.
Increasing Farmers' Capacity: Training and counseling for farmers about how to use effective and efficient fertilizer.
Increasing Financing Access: Facilitating credit access for farmers to increase business capital, including for fertilizer purchases.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

Case Study: The study is limited to a case study in Pagar Jati Village, which may not be representative of other areas.
Data Availability: The study relies on secondary data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date.
Methodology: The study uses a qualitative approach, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should consider the following directions:

Quantitative Analysis: Conducting a quantitative analysis to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Comparative Study: Conducting a comparative study to compare the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program in different areas.
Policy Evaluation: Conducting a policy evaluation to assess the impact of the fertilizer subsidy program on farmers' welfare.

Q: What are the references used in the study?

A: The study relies on the following references:

Central Statistics Agency (BPS). (2020). Indonesia in Figures 2020.
Ministry of Agriculture. (2011). Fertilizer Subsidy Program in the SBY-Boediono Era.
World Bank. (2019). Indonesia: Agriculture and Rural Development.

Q: What are the appendices used in the study?

A: The study includes the following appendices:

Appendix A: List of interviewees and their contact information.
Appendix B: List of documents and data sources used in the study.
Appendix C: List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the study.